Regarding BenzBoy's findings. It is an inescapable fact that these 107s of the seventies are now thirty years old. Consequently, something has got to give in the rust department, doesn't it ? Furthermore, at times, they seemed to be owned by the wrong people. By that, I mean that the cars do not get the proper attention both body and interior wise. So many times I have come across situations where "my mate knows all about this, and that", when in fact he, or they, do not have an appreciation of what is right, what is wrong, and they are only concerned in achieving a fix as cheap as possible. Well, in the long run, that just doesn't work.
This particular car can best be described as a back pocket burner, and not much more than that. Money to be spent everywhere, but it will find a home with someone who can "fix them cheaply". At least with this car, one can see the condition and walk into the deal with open eyes. I have pitied owners who bought an SL or SLC 'beautifully' presented and then some months later discover that they have bought an absolute millstone, or 'hip pocket burner'. I well remember a guy that had paid $15K. for a signal red 350SL that looked absolutely great from a distance of ten meters. Once you got close, and once you started 'poking about', it was an unmitigated disaster. It had also been fitted with huge 'chromies', and you could hardly keep the car in a straight line. We fixed the rust in the bodywork and painted it, plus a brand new interior, but in the end the guy hated the car - maybe even us because the cost factor was never ending. This car has already featured in the pages of topklasse, showing the extent of rust etc. It is a 1973 350SL. Regards Styria