2015 S-Class S600

[Styria]

I just love the interior - perhaps just a little spoilt or cheapened by the DVD screen "add-ons" for the rear passengers. Regards Styria

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7bpo4JXbtfc

 

[Oversize]

I like the speaker placement for the front driver and passenger. I love the finish apart from the rear dome light. Agreed the rear screens look like an afterthought... The boot looks very small for such a large car particularly with the cooler fitted!

 

[260ebenz]

S600 is a superb looking car overall in my opinion.

How much does the S600 V12 cost?

V12 the cost of fuel but if you can afford to drive the V12 well I guess who cares about the price of fuel!

Very futuristic looking car the S600 and the craftsmanship of the interior stands out really well.

Note the WAECO wine cooler in the boot that does take up quite a bit of space in the boot.

My S-Class has more room in the boot well of course no wine cooler taking up space!

 

[Michel]

Having been to the launch of the new S-Class, I can vouch for its luxurious touches and fast performance - and that was the S350 (V6 turbo-diesel)

The S600 is due on sale in Australia late this year, about the same time as the first next-generation C-Class small cars should arrive.
But there will be no S65 models coming to Oz only the S63 AMG

 

[Styria]

I get continually confused by S63, S65' 5.5 litre, turbo charged, non turbo charged - AMG, standard Company fare - fast forward ten years, fifteen years, trying to purchase spare parts - it's a horrifying thought and daunting task. You'll be on your own. Sorry to be somewhat negative about all this. Regards. Styria

 

[Michel]

I get continually confused by S63, S65' 5.5 litre, turbo charged, non turbo charged - AMG, standard Company fare - fast forward ten years, fifteen years, trying to purchase spare parts - it's a horrifying thought and daunting task. You'll be on your own. Sorry to be somewhat negative about all this. Regards. Styria

I don't blame you for the confusion.
The S63 is the 5.5 litre twin turbo charged V8 while the S65 is the 6.0 litre bi-turbo charged V12

 

[Styria]

I don't blame you for the confusion.
The S63 is the 5.5 litre twin turbo charged V8 while the S65 is the 6.0 litre bi-turbo charged V12

And I haven't even mentioned the 250 varieties - 1.8 litres . I just wish they'd be bit more in tune with their numbers and what they stand for. Surely that shouldn't be all that hard - nay, difficult. Regards. Styria

 

[BenzBoy]

And I haven't even mentioned the 250 varieties - 1.8 litres . I just wish they'd be bit more in tune with their numbers and what they stand for. Surely that shouldn't be all that hard - nay, difficult. Regards. Styria

What you mean is; why don't they return to an earlier naming protocol when the numbers related to engine capacity? I agree. The naming system now is just a jumble.
Regards,
B

 

[Michel]

What you mean is; why don't they return to an earlier naming protocol when the numbers related to engine capacity? I agree. The naming system now is just a jumble.
Regards,
B

Confuse the enemy... That is the motto!